If you purchased a new house
after January 1, 2003, or are planning to buy one, Senate Bill 800 affects your
rights as a homeowner, and the rights of a builder to correct deficiencies
discovered in new construction. Senate
Bill 800 was passed on August 31, 2002, and signed into law by Governor Davis
on September 21, 2002. SB 800 applies to
all condos, town homes, and single-family residences that close escrow after
the first of this year.
This bill is significant
because it makes major changes to the laws governing construction defects. Among other things, the bill eliminates the
four and ten year statutes of limitations for patent and latent defects that
homeowners now have to bring suit against builders. It attempts to define defects by establishing
specific standards that components of a house must meet to be considered
serviceable, and it creates a detailed process that both the builder and home
owner must follow before litigation for defects can occur.
Up until December of 2000, a
homeowner could sue a builder for construction defects as long as they were
discovered within the four and ten year statute of limitations. However, in December of that year, the
California Supreme Court handed down a decision in a case known as Aas v.
Superior Court (2000, 24 Cal. 4th 627), that stated a builder
was not responsible for construction defects unless the defect caused personal
or property damage. This was a major
setback for consumers and gave builders a legal defense to avoid being
responsible for defective construction.
Senate Bill 800 attempts to
change the effects of the Aas decision, and in the process creates an uncertain
legal landscape for both builders and consumers. While the bill was drafted to provide more
protection for both builders and homeowners, builders, insurance companies, and
attorneys have clearly influenced its final form.
To understand the legal
implications of SB 800, let’s look at what the bill entails. First, this bill states that any action
seeking damages for construction defects against a builder, subcontractor,
product manufacturer, or design professional, will have to comply with the
requirements and time frames of this bill.
The bill also says that a homeowner cannot file for a claim of defect(s)
until the builder has had a chance to inspect and repair the alleged deficiency. These two requirements benefit both the
builder and the homeowner.
In order to establish a
claim, a homeowner must submit a written notice to the builder stating the
defect(s). Then, the builder has 14 days
to schedule and complete the initial inspection of the defect(s). If destructive testing is necessary, repairs
must be done within 48 hours, and the costs borne by the builder. If a second inspection is required, it must
be performed within 40 days of the initial inspection. After the defects have been substantiated,
the builder, subcontractor, or manufacturer has 30 days to make an offer to
repair the problem. These specific time
periods are so restrictive that they could actually end up delaying the process
and be argued by the builder or owner in court.
If the homeowner does not
want the builder or subcontractor to actually make the repair, they can request
up to three additional contractors to bid the repair of the defects, and then
select one to perform the work. The
builder would then pay the other contractor for the repairs. The builder is also allowed to offer a cash
settlement in lieu of a repair. The bill
also states that every effort shall be made to complete the repair within 120
days.
Under the provisions of this
bill, the builder is not be responsible for defects or damages resulting from
an act of God or nature, an alteration or wear and tear, a homeowner’s failure
to maintain their home, or their failure to minimize or prevent damage from
occurring. SB 800 puts specific
responsibilities on homeowners to perform detailed maintenance (as provided by
builders and manufacturers), and exercise care whenever modifying or repairing
their homes. If an owner fails to
properly maintain a component and damage occurs, the builder may not be
responsible. Yet there is no language in
the bill stating what normal maintenance is, or what specific duties an owner
has to keep his or her home in good repair.
So what actually constitutes
a defect? There are over 45 standards
stating how certain components of a building shall function. The descriptions of the standards are very
generic, somewhat vague, and essentially state the obvious. For example, the standards for components
preventing water intrusion (exterior siding, windows, doors, roofs,
foundations) state that the component shall not allow unintended water to pass
beyond, around or through its designed or actual moisture barrier. What constitutes unintended water?
Another example of vague
language in the bill is the standard for foundations, retaining walls, and other
concrete surfaces, which states that there shall not be substantial cracking or
vertical displacement. How much is
substantial cracking or vertical displacement, one half inch, or two inches? Right now, there are no clear answers, and
each situation would have to be judged separately. Without defined and measurable standards,
builders and owners may not come to agreement on what really needs to be done
to correct a defect.
While the standards attempt
to define construction defects, they are not the panacea that the legislature
had hoped for. To make matters worse, SB
800 has dramatically changed the statute of limitations within which various
components are to operate properly, potentially compromising the quality of new
construction. In my next column I will
discuss the changes in these limitations, and what affect they will have on
buyers of new homes.
John R. Schneider is a licensed general building
contractor and an ICBO certified residential code specialist. He is president
of All About Homes, a residential inspection company, and has been performing
code and construction consultations since 1985.
Readers may address their comments to John
Schneider, 24326
Mission Blvd., Suite 7, Hayward, CA 94544, Fax number: 510-537-8666, or
on the web at www.allabouthomes.com
. Schneider will answer questions of
general interest in the paper. He
reserves the right to edit the letter for brevity and clarity. Readers are encouraged to contact a competent
contractor or code consultant for specific information regarding questions they
may have about their home.
Copyright 2006, John R. Schneider, all rights reserved.